If you’re the one who wants to develop a mobile application for your business but doesn’t know where to start and what type of application is best suited for your requirements, you’ve encountered the perfect place. Whether you should adopt the native model or the hybrid one, entirely depends on the nature of the application.

While there is no “this fits into everything” technology which will magically ramp up your business, each technology has its certain benefits as well as cons.

Let us, first of all, understand what these technologies have to offer and the best way to develop your mobile application.

Native Mobile Apps

Starting with the most common type of mobile applications, native applications are designed to run on a particular device or platform such as the Android OS, iOS or other operating systems such as Mozilla’s Firefox OS.

Let’s take a look at the advantages of choosing to develop natively:

Easy to use

Native applications follow the standard guidelines which exist to offer a consistent user experience across the platform such as Android’s left aligned header.

What is the end result? The user is easily able to navigate through the application because it is something which the user is familiar with already. Also, the developers won’t have to spend time on teaching new users on how to use the application.

Enhanced performance

Since the application is designed to run only on a single platform, it will be better optimized to run on the same. That literally translates to a reduction in memory and battery usage.

If the guidelines are followed correctly, the app will run faster when compared to hybrid applications.
More performance means that the developers can also work on providing more features such as enhanced gestures and use the hardware to its full potential.

Unrestricted access to device resources

If one chooses to develop a native application for their business or product, they can ensure that all the device capabilities will be available to them without any hassles whatsoever.

This means that the app can easily take advantages of the camera, geolocation or even the smartphone’s database. The only limiting factor here will be the power of the device itself.

Easier app debugging

Suppose you wanted the application to take up a specified amount of memory. When you are done developing the application, and it eats up more RAM than you expected, it is far easier to find the source of the problem when designing a native app compared to a hybrid one.

The debugging tools offered by the platform developers make it super-easy to find the cause of the problem.

Support from respective app stores

Developing apps natively means you can list them on the operating system’s app stores easily. Just take a look at your smartphone’s featured app section, and you won’t find many apps which are developed using the hybrid model.

As discussed before, each technology has its caveats. So, what are the disadvantages?

Cost and Speed of development

You don’t want your app to be just like your competition’s offering, do you? To develop unique features, developers might need more time, affecting the speed at which it is being developed.

This translates directly to a sharp rise in the development cost, meaning you might have to shell out more money than you initially thought.

Limited to just one operating system

This is one of the most significant factors to take into consideration when you consider developing a native mobile application.

Since you are developing for just one platform, say Android, you will need to start from scratch if you want to make it available on iOS.

Hybrid Mobile Apps

Hybrid applications are becoming popular with time since they can run on multiple operating systems.

In a nutshell, hybrid apps are simply web applications which are mostly built using HTML5 and JavaScript, then wrapped in a native container, which is responsible for loading the webpage.

The most common examples which make use of this are Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.

Hybrid applications fill the gap where natively designed applications tend to fail

Here are some advantages:

OS Compatibility

As opposed to native mobile applications, hybrid apps can easily run on multiple operating systems such as Android and iOS.

This eliminates the very dilemma of the client who is trying to figure out on what platform they should launch their product first.

Quicker coding time

We already know that native apps take a huge amount of time to code. This is where hybrid apps shine and rise.

Since they are just websites presented in a native container, the coding and development time associated with these apps is much lower than native apps.

United app structure

Since the application works regardless of a particular platform, you won’t have to spend time or resources reworking on the application logic itself. Since we will be writing the code only once, it will be easier to find problems too.

Low development cost

Hybrid apps don’t need developers who specialize in a particular programming language.

The development time associated with these apps is also much much lower when compared to native apps, allowing an organization to save up a great amount of money.

These are the areas where native mobile apps lack in general. The hybrid model tends to rule out all the cons when developing native apps. But, they come with their own set of problems:

Slower performance

As mentioned before, native apps can easily make use of all the resources available. Hybrid applications lack this.

Since they work with various mobile technologies such as Kendo, Onsen, and Cordova, they might take more time loading, considerably decreasing the performance.

Poor User Experience

When we think of a user using any application, they are very unlikely to give any application a third chance. Many users give up using an application after two attempts.

Slow debugging

If you encounter any problems or bugs when developing a hybrid application, be patient.

The debugging, irrespective of the app development status, is a painful and long process, even if the idea of writing and maintaining a single source code might sound attractive.

What to choose then?

Both hybrid and native applications come with their pros and cons, just like everything else in the world.

There are some questions you need to ask yourself before you choose any one of these approaches.

Native apps can help the user provide a robust, lag-free experience if they are designed and coded according to the guidelines specified, whereas hybrid applications offer the benefit of simplicity and low cost.

If you have the capital to afford developers for different platforms, go with the native development approach, since they offer solid security and better user experience.

Natively built apps also tend to save money and time in the long run.

In contrast to the above-mentioned model, hybrid models are more simple and require less technical knowledge and cost.

They also offer the developers and the business to roll out experimental features and study the user feedback and incorporate into their products in an easy manner.

The answer entirely depends on the company’s business model. Facebook has tried adopting the hybrid approach but reverted to the native model since they have to go through a lot of inconsistencies when using the same.

That being said, if you do have the required expertise and capital, the benefits of developing an app natively will surely be profitable in the long run.

If you’re still nervous about choosing the right one, Leave it on us! From suggesting you the best approach and type of application to developing the one, we do it all! So, go ahead and say hello!

We’re listening!